Should artists curtail their liberal imagination? This is the question now being posed everywhere. The most recent arrest of Chandra Mohan, an arts student, has made people realize the restrictions of the so-called “freedom of expression” which an Indian is entitled to. So even with the constitution providing for such a freedom then what is with the moral police to stick their noses into something that they don’t understand (in fact not many people can understand ART including me) and creating this nation-wide controversy on how unlimited the freedom of art is. Well there are many things (besides art in itself) that I still can’t seem to understand.
Firstly, what is the parameter to every freedom that we enjoy? And who sets these parameters? Well if you are talking about the government setting it then everyone is better off with no such parameters. This is because everyone knows the after effect of setting such a parameter. The next day the opposition party calls for a nationwide strike and again the news channels get an opportunity to sit and discuss the drawbacks of such things.Another controversy!!! What about the Indian bureaucrats?Do they have what it takes to set these parameters? Well thinking of it I don’t think so. So then why all these far-fetched questions? Because somebody has to set the parameters for such a country like
Secondly, the Vadodara incident actually happened at an exhibition at the
This is one of the many incidents of art being subjected to such mistreatments. There is the long pending case of M.F.Hussain for depicting Hindu gods and goddesses in an offensive manner. If it is about obscenity somebody is talking about then what is the future of many monuments where women have been sculpted in a so-called obscene manner. So offensive and obscenity are words to be used depending on an individual. What might appear as offensive to somebody might be pleasing to another and in a country like
So what is happening all over the country right now? Protests everywhere and that too all the artists have joined together and put up a common front. Even activists like Arundathi Roy have taken this opportunity to express her views on freedom to artists. In fact it seems as if the whole of
Though this incident has sparked off many protests it is time we think about what it has brought into the limelight. This incident has made people realise how “unabridged freedom” (or is it abridged) that one enjoys might lead to dangerous consequences. This has made people realise that even the biggest democracy in the world is home to such idle acts of terrorism. It has made people realise that
Now for the future course of action. I would like to ask what future course? As I mentioned its not advisable to restrict one’s freedom now as people have known what it means to have such freedom. But, as usual, one can expect the government to take such a step. The only future course of action that I believe in would be when each one takes that step to change for the better. Here changing doesn’t mean restricting oneself but it means that one should know the limitations of what is possible in a conservative (though it is self-proclaimed to be rational) country like India. Well what is the best way to end this rather nationalistic content than by saying Jai Hind!!!
1 comment:
I agree with "most" of the views you expressed.
Do you really think it would be a good idea to let each person set his own yardsticks for various parameters? Then it would lead to chaos in the society. Since man is a social animal, there should be certain minimum common denominator for certain parameters. For eg., what should be the speed limit for a automobile? If everyone sets his own, then..........
Post a Comment